Editorial Comment for Chung et al.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comment on Yuan Et Al
It has come to our attention that the work of Yuan et al. [1] is being represented as definitive regarding the existence of a particular nonstrange, isoscalar, spin three dibaryon, d * , which we [2] , among others [3, 4, 5, 6, 8] , have proposed exists. We therefore wish to comment on this paper and its relation to ours and those of others. In our work [2] , the d * dibaryon is constructed in ...
متن کاملReplication in genetic association studies: Comment on the editorial by Spector et al.
imab treatment. First, the authors did not specify the time points at which the reconstitution of the naive B cell subset was measured. Rouziere et al found highly mutated memory B cells in the early phase of B cell reconstitution after rituximab treatment in 2 patients with RA (3). Second, the authors did not compare reconstitution of different subsets, but focused on the most prominent subset...
متن کاملResponse to comment by Moxon et al.
We would like to thank Clinical Science for the opportunity to respond to the letter [1] which suggests that while we have been able to show that PTP1B inhibitor, trodusquemine, decreases atherosclerotic plaque size as well as serum triglycerides and cholesterol, that we have not shown that it reverses the plaque size, using in vivo imaging techniques such as MRI scanning or ultrasound. Both Ld...
متن کاملComment on study by Backman et al
BfArM acknowledges the submission of the manuscript by Backman et al. (2005) concerning the occurrence of breast cancer associated with Mirena use. The manuscript was scheduled for publication in October 2005 and meanwhile has been published (Backman T. et al. Use of the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer. Obstet and Gynecol 2005;106:813-7). Unfortunately, the study ...
متن کاملInteractive comment on “Relationship between low-cloud presence and the amount of overlying aerosols” by C. E. Chung et al
We thank the reviewer for well understanding the key point of the paper. About the AOD difference over the southeast Atlantic, as the reviewer suspected, this could be due to a bias in retrieval algorithm. This could also be a real phenomenon as the cloud over this part of the world has a strong diurnal cycle. Examining this aspect to the full (especially the retrieval algorithm) would require ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Endourology
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0892-7790,1557-900X
DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0723